September 12, 2020 Saturday, Covid-19 Workshop, Part 4
Sharing, Q&A on Polarity, Donald Trump, Multiple Realities/Earths
Barbara: We’ll get started. For now, let’s toss this back to you. How is life going for you? Are there things you like to share? I don’t mean long stories, but just, what is happening for you? What are you learning? How is Covid-19, smoke, politics, how are they serving as teachers for you? What’s working well? What’s hard? Anything you’d like to share about? And we’ll also open to questions.
(personal sharing not audible over Zoom or transcribed)
(question about participation in protests; is it safe? Entering stores; is it safe?)
Barbara: For me, it comes down a lot to who is choosing? Who is choosing not to go, who is choosing to go? The ego, the one who should, the one who should not, the bad one, the good one?
When we’re dealing with Covid, remember when that little voice comes in that says, “I should go,” but you’re endangering so many people as well as yourself if you do go. What if you go and you’re the one who happens to be a carrier? So I’ve been asking myself that question about participation in anything. If I happen to be a carrier of Covid and I went, would it be worth my having been there if I endangered other people? And I’m finding that’s a helpful question for me. It takes it out of the fear realm of “Will I catch it?” to “Will I do harm?”
(sharing continues)
Barbara: Just on the tiny chance that you are. I’m just asking in general, in terms of will my being there, might it endanger others? Not, “if it would endanger me”—fear comes up. Less fear comes up in the personal ego way but it’s still real, deeper fear: “I choose not to do anything that could endanger others, and so I choose to back off here.”
Just about going into a store. When I ask myself, “Do I need to go into the store, take out this—Oh, I want it, but I don’t need it. But I want it.” But what if I were a carrier? What if I endangered others by going into this store? Do I still need to go into the store? I know it’s a one in one thousand chance, but no, I don’t need to endanger others. It helps me to back off and to see where the grasping is coming in.
(sharing continues)
Barbara: Let me reply to that. Actually, let Aaron reply to that… (he incorporates)
Aaron: My blessings and love to you all. I am Aaron. Thank you, Q, for what you’ve shared.
First, just dropping in the thought: some of you might like to read some of my discussions with Q’uo in The Aaron/Q’uo Dialogues around this topic, the free will choice that beings have to ascend through positive or negative polarity, and that before the incarnation they may have made that choice. Or for some, been making it for a long time, as most of you have been making a choice to awaken through positive polarity and with a strong commitment to do no harm.
A being does not have to be totally negative to move forth in a negatively polarized track. It can be still 40% positive, 60% negative, but its negativity is going to propel them in that negative track.
The biggest distinction is a commitment to service to self or service to others. Both are viable paths a long way in but not all the way. As long as there is a distinction made between self and other, one cannot move path 6th density. One can move into 6th density and be a strongly negatively polarized 6th density being, but one cannot move past that because one is still creating the idea of self versus other, and 7th density, 8th density, in other words a fully awakened Buddha, fully awakened being of any sort, can no longer hold any idea of differentiation between self and other. So, the negative path only goes to 6th density, and then one must backtrack all the way back and shift into a positively polarized path.
However, there are still strongly negatively polarized beings that are trying to forge ahead and find some way to become what they envision as a vastly powerful negatively polarized being because they hope to have reached 7th or 8th density in negativity. It can’t be done. That doesn’t mean that terrible harm cannot come from such a being, only, they cannot fully awaken without knowing their relationship with all that is.
Speaking of someone like Donald Trump, I would ask you to have compassion for him, that he is so deeply caught in service to self that he cannot recognize his interrelationship with others, truly does not have awareness of the kinds of harm he creates because he can only see himself as/and others reflected in his shadow. Ultimately, this is going to bring him enormous pain. So if there’s going to be compassion for this man, such compassion does not offer him permission to go ahead and do harm, but rather, it holds the enormous agony that he will experience as he holds himself separate and more separate and more separate, the further he goes into negative polarity.
That is all.
(sharing)
Aaron: I am Aaron. How many realities are there? Not just positive and negative, but millions of realities. For each of you in any one day, you may experience something this way and that way and waver between them. The person who is kind and loving; the person who is offensive; who is both. The Earth where there is strong positive polarity; the Earth where there is strong negative polarity; the Earth where there are different mixes.
When you speak of this statement from <Bashar> of two different Earths, please don’t take that literally. But figuratively, there are a million different Earths. In some of them, let me put it in this way. There are possible futures to the Earth, and it seems likely that many of these possible futures will happen. Don’t take the Earth as just one physical shape, one planet, but the whole energy of the Earth moving this way and this way and this way, as happens to you.
Think of somebody who says something to you that brings up anger, and you become a certain person reacting to that anger. And then a friend puts a hand on your shoulder and simply reminds you to be mindful, and you come back and some of the anger eases. Where is the angry person, then? Is he or she still there?
Then, at the same time as that person is speaking in terms of bringing up anger, a deeply compassionate part of you comes forth, not feeling anger at all. Each of these has their own reality. We can’t say that one reality is more real or less real than the other. The question is, seeing these different realities, which one do you choose to embrace? This is your free will choice. So if negativity comes up and you choose not to embrace it, but also not to have to deny it, but if that negativity becomes a ground for compassion, then you have followed that reality leading you further into compassion. If that negativity leads you more into fear and hatred, then you’ve embraced that direction, that reality. One is no less real than the other. Which one do you choose to embrace, to give your power to, to give your love to?
How many Earths are there? This is not the question. Which one do you choose to empower with your attention and your love? That is the Earth that you will be part of, and that you will help to support the fullness of into the future.
I’m going to return the body to Barbara…